L ifestyle /C ulture
‘Sublet’ Charms But Doesn’t Dazzle
FI L M
SASHA ROGELBERG | JE STAFF
IF DIRECTOR EYTAN FOX
wanted his film “Sublet” to
be an easy summer watch, he
succeeded; if he wanted the
film to deliver a story with
depth, originality and indis-
putable chemistry between its
characters, he fell short.

Co-written by Fox and Itay
Segal, “Sublet” premiered at
the Philadelphia Jewish Film
Festival in November 2020 and
is now in wider release. The film
follows the fictional New York
Times travel writer Michael
Green (John Benjamin Hickey)
during his five-day jaunt in Tel
Aviv, as he stays in scruffy film
student Tomer’s (Niv Nissim)
one-bedroom apartment.

Tomer’s messy and juvenile
apartment is in staunch
contrast to Michael: a graying
50-something in glasses, a
button-up and blazer, his
necessities packed effectively
into two small bags.

As soon as Michael gingerly
places his five blue button-up
shirts into Tomer’s closet,
half-filled with balled-up
T-shirts, he cements himself as
not only a fish out of water, but
as the outsider — a middle-aged
journalist in a neighborhood
of artists, an American among
Israelis, a romantic monoga-
mist among free-spirited youth.

Tomer, critical of Michael’s
stale approach to seeing the
city, quickly invites himself
to become Michael’s tour
guide, and they ditch the art
museums in favor of the beach,
local hole-in-the-wall cuisine
and a risqué, underattended
dance performance.

As Michael fills his days
with sightseeing to write about
in his column “The Intrepid
Traveler,” it becomes clear
that he is all but intrepid: He’s
reluctant to go out and enjoy
Tomer’s hedonistic lifestyle,
opting instead to try to nurse
his ailing relationship with his
husband over FaceTime.

Throughout the film,
Michael’s emotional baggage
and Tomer’s carefree nature
are never directly at odds with
one another, but we see them
meet and contend with each
other in Michael’s head.

Michael struggles to figure
out what he wants in his life,
his marriage and his family,
especially after witnessing the
triumphs and tribulations of
his foil — an eccentric gay
man of a younger generation,
untouched by profound strife.

It’s this internal battle
within Michael — seen only
through his shifting eyes,
tightly pursed lips and visible
discomfort — that is the film’s
greatest strength. The messages
are salient, but never hit you
over the head.

With its balanced and
symmetrical shots, “Sublet” is
beautiful to watch. As Michael
walks through the Tel Aviv
Museum of Art, the corners of
the frame perfectly align with
the corners of the prints on the
wall. When Tomer takes Michael
to the beach and the market,
pops of color delight the eyes.

Nissim’s charm brings Tomer
to life, his wit a natural comple-
ment to Michael, bewildered
and apprehensive, scene after
scene. Though a seasoned actor
(Hickey) working alongside
a film newbie (Nissim) played
well to Michael and Tomer’s
dynamic, the film’s writing
undermines the actors’ chops.

Though the film attempts to
depict Tomer as the immature,
naive-at-times, boyish post-ad-
olescent, Tomer sometimes
feels like he’s too good to be
true: noble and generous,
conscientious, curious (and, of
course, handsome).

As Michael and Tomer’s
relationship develops, it feels as
Steven Rice is currently on the
National Kidney Registry (NKR)
but the average wait is 5 years or
longer. The only way to shorten
the wait time is for him to get a
transplant from a Living Donor.

Even though most of us are born
with 2 kidneys, we only need 1
healthy kidney to live. That means
you, or someone you know, could
save a life by choosing to be a
donor. Kidneys from living donors
can last twice as long as kidneys
from deceased donors.

To learn more about the living donor process for Steven Rice,
please contact us at jassr4@comcast.net
You can also contact our transplant center at
https://penntransplant.donorscreen.org/register/now 18
JUNE 24, 2021
Tomer (Niv Nissim) and Michael (John Benjamin Hickey) on the beach in
Tel Aviv
Photo by Daniel Miller
though the film trades Tomer’s
depth for likability. As a result,
the unspoken complexities of
their relationship are never fully
understood by the audience.

Opposite to Nissim, Hickey
embodied discomfort so fully
in Michael, that at times, it
was challenging to differen-
tiate when Michael was truly
uncomfortable and when he
was simply uncomfortable to
look at on the screen.

In some scenes, particu-
larly at the beginning of the
film, Michael speaks mechan-
ically, giving mini monologues
here and there that serve to
expedite the plot, at the
expense of natural dialogue
between Michael and Tomer,
and Michael and his husband.

Given that the film clocks in
at under 90 minutes, some plot
expediting can be forgiven.

Still, despite its solid pacing
and clear character development,
“Sublet” fails to pack a punch.

The meeting and mingling
of two different worlds is not
new in cinema. Although
Nissim’s fresh acting in his
film debut and Tel Aviv’s
charming locale help give the
film vibrancy, they were not
enough to set this film apart
from others in this genre.

At one point, Tomer sits
Michael down to watch one
of his “artistic horror” films,
a couple of strewn-together
scenes of naked actors, reptilian
masks and haunting silhouettes.

Tomer, though he didn’t craft
something award-winning,
clearly understands what makes
a quality film: good lighting,
angles, strong characterization
and eliciting a response from an
audience. When the film ends, Michael
sits in silence for a while before
saying, straight-faced, “It’s
good.” After finishing “Sublet,”
it’s easy to feel a little bit like
Michael in that moment: Seeing
a film that, albeit competent and
satisfying to the eye, was a little
watery; but, if you managed your
expectations, it was good. l
srogelberg@jewishexponent.com |
215-832-0741 JEWISH EXPONENT
JEWISHEXPONENT.COM